what patent did samsung steal from apple

Jurors in the latest courtroom battle between Apple and Samsung have delivered their verdict siding with Apple, deciding Samsung needs to pay Apple $533 million for infringing utility and design patents relating to the iPhone with its own devices. It was not clear Wednesday how much more, if anything, Apple will receive. A jury awarded Apple (AAPL) $539 million in May, leaving Samsung with an outstanding balance of $140 million it owed Apple. The jury awarded Apple $533.3 million for Samsung’s violation of so-called design patents and $5.3 million for the violation of so-called utility patents. Apple and Samsung just ended their epic seven-year legal patent infringement fight. Samsung's expert witness, accountant Michael J. Wagner, largely discussed the Korean giant's accounting practices. It was found by the court that Samsung had violated a variety of Apple's patents, including those for the "Bounce-Back Effect" and "Tap to Zoom.". Favourite answer. Apple Inc. is accused of stealing trade secrets and improperly using Masimo Corp. inventions related to health monitoring in its Apple Watch. As part of the new trial, the burden was not on Samsung to disprove the entire smartphone is an "article of manufacture," but instead with Apple. It's not a pane of glass. Jurors started their deliberations on Friday and continued after the weekend on the following Monday, before making their decision today. Many devices also infringed on hardware style or icon setup. A representative for Apple declined to comment beyond referring CNNMoney to a statement the company released last month following the jury award. © 2020 Cable News Network. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd. was the first of a series of ongoing lawsuits between Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics regarding the design of smartphones and tablet computers; between them, the companies made more than half of smartphones sold worldwide as of July 2012. Litigating the case cost the two world's two largest smartphone makers hundreds of millions of dollars and resulted in several rulings and appeals. The Seoul central district court ordered Apple to remove the iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPad 1 and iPad 2 from shelves in South Korea, citing they infringed two of Samsung's telecommunications patents. It's not a display screen that doesn't show a GUI. LG and RIM are fairly high up, in at 13th and 15th respectively, while HTC is way down in 38th in the count-up of protected innovation. The iPhone producer had to convince the court that the infringed patents apply to the whole product, not individual components. While Apple wants the full $1 billion for the infringement, Samsung had previously advised it was willing to pay $28 million. All Rights Reserved. Apple and Samsung have finally put an end to their long-running patent battle whose central question was whether Samsung copied the iPhone. The settlement closes a dispute that started in 2011 when Apple accused Samsung (SSNLF) of "slavishly" copying the iPhone's design and software features. Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Advertise on AI. Glass backs. The question is what did they apply those designs to. Morningstar: © 2019 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. All times are ET. Apple knew it was getting confidential information from the two men, the companies said. A total of $533,316,606 was awarded to Apple for Samsung's violation of three design patents, while the remaining $5,325,050 was for Samsung's infringement on two of Apple's utility patents. Apple says the price is $379 million and Samsung says they stole only $52 million from Apple in the form of intellectual property in the phones in question. Lv 7. Apple and Samsung just ended their epic seven-year legal patent infringement fight. In this case, the decision the jurors made determined how much Samsung has to pay Apple as part of the infringement, rather than whether the infringement took place at all. An appeals court ruled on Monday that Samsung's $930 million penalty, stemming from its patent infringement suit with Apple, must be adjusted, in a mixed courtroom outcome for the iPhone maker. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., said Samsung Electronics Co Ltd did not infringe Apple's "quick links" patent, and that two other patents … A California jury on Friday found that Samsung had infringed on various Apple design and utility patents with its tablets and smartphones and awarded Cupertino approximately $1.05 billion in damages. October 25, 2017. Related: In tech, patents are trophies -- and these companies are dominating. Most stock quote data provided by BATS. The ruling meant the case was sent back to a lower court for a damages re-determination. As Apple was "betting the company" on launching the iPhone, Joswiak noted this caused Apple to file for a vast number of patents to protect its design and other elements, such as communications techniques. In short yes Samsung did infringe on apple patents but if you take it from ux and technical points no samsund did not copy. Apple says Samsung copied iPhone after suffering 'crisis of design' Apple, during opening arguments in a new patent infringement trial, wants $2 billion in damages from smartphone rival Samsung. All content of the Dow Jones branded indices © S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC 2019 and/or its affiliates. An appeals court ruled on Monday that Samsung's $930 million penalty, stemming from its patent infringement suit with Apple, must be adjusted, in a mixed courtroom outcome for the iPhone maker. Last year, Apple and Nokia settled an intellectual property dispute, in which the Finnish company alleged that Apple had violated its technology patents, with Nokia receiving a one-off payment of $2bn, as well as royalties. Instead, this is the new S-Launcher dock ‘created by’ Samsung. Samsung lawyer John Quinn told Judge Lucy Koh he had some issues with the verdict that would be addressed in post-trial motions. 7 years ago. The verdict is in: Samsung vs. Apple. Samsung ordered to pay Apple more than $1BILLION after jury says they STOLE patented iPhone designs - and now faces having to pull ALL their cellphones and tablets from the U.S. Samsung, which was found six years ago to have infringed Apple’s patents, had argued in the current case that it should have to pay a penalty of only $28 million. Samsung is still continuing with their game of stealing ideas from Apple. Apple and Samsung had one other major patent battle, which was first decided in 2014 but didn’t end until last year. Ultimately, jurors found Samsung had infringed on the majority of the patents in question -- including software features like double-tap zooming and scrolling. In the spring of 2011, Apple began litigating against Samsung in patent infringement suits, while Apple and … 6,226,449 and 5,579,239, or in shorthand, '449 and '239. Although "Apple won most of the battles," Samsung found way to "design around" the patents Apple claimed it copied, said Michael Risch, a patent law professor at Villanova University. More:Samsung and Apple are back in court over iPhone design.Here's why. The only major “innovation” (as is typical for Apple) is the price. 2 Answers. Apple, in contrast, has kept the same design since 2015. There's a reason you may not find a Quarter Pounder. The rundown: Apple says Samsung copied the iPhone and iPad. After days of deliberating, a federal jury handed down its verdict in the Apple v. Samsung case on Thursday, declaring the South Korean tech giant owes $533,316,606 for … After a brief from Apple's camp revealed on Tuesday that the Cuppertino based firm wants $2.525 billion from Samsung to cover what the Korean based manufacturer "unjustly enriched" itself with by using Apple patents, Apple might have insulted Samsung by claiming that Sammy's patents are worth about a half-cent each, at most. Kare admitted "I get that a display screen is a thing," and agreed that Apple's patent illustrations included dotted lines that, while providing a complete picture of the iPhone concept, are not necessarily covered in its claims. Apple attorneys showed the jury photographs of products including Macs, iPods, Powerbooks, and MacBooks to drive the point of design being "in the DNA of the company.". work at Apple, began pursuing patent applications for things that he learned at the companies. "This kind of blatant copying is wrong, and we need to protect Apple's intellectual property when companies steal our ideas." Take Apple and Samsung. The lawsuit claims that these patents were used for the Apple Watch series 4 and series 5—in fact, Masimo says that Apple did so knowingly. A number of key concepts, such as pinch-to … Apple did not violate patents owned by Samsung Electronics in making the iPod touch, iPhone and iPad, a judge at the International Trade Commission said in a preliminary ruling on Friday. Apple sought $1.05 billion. Check … The first witness in the trial was Apple marketing VP Greg Joswiak, testifying that design was an important part of the company, critical even before the 2007 debut of the iPhone. In late 2016, the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled unanimously in Samsung's favor in December 2017, deciding that design patents only cover individual smartphone components and not the entire mobile device. Samsung's filing, partially released today by the Wall Street … Today, Yahoo points to Samsung’s new ‘S-Launcher’ dock for Windows 8 computers. "If you replace [a component], you're trying to get back to that thing that you bought.". Relevance. Wrong, Apple is in fact 31st on the list with around a thousand registered patents, while friend/foe Samsung tops the chart, with close to 12000 in total. A federal judge later reduced that penalty by $450 million. Samsung will sell you a stylus for $30. This is one of the reasons you will see that iOS 8 is very much like android 3.5K views Apple’s seem to just be more high profile due to it being one of the most talked-about companies on the planet. Apple offering '[email protected]' college mentorship program in early 2021, Netatmo doorbell, leaked Hue gear, and our picks for 2020 on the HomeKit Insider Podcast, May 2020 in review: iPhone 12 leaked, MacBook Pro 13-inch gets the new keyboard, HomePod mini works with 18W power supplies after 14.3 software update, What to do before selling, trading or giving away your iPhone or iPad, Apple Watch prototype hardware images show early watchOS software, Top 5 Apple deals on Amazon (#2 is a fan favorite), Apple Music placeholder in Tesla software suggests imminent support, Apple reportedly pushing for follow-up to Mariah Carey's Christmas Special in 2021, Apple Japan spotlights App Store in new end-of-year ad, M1 benchmarks prove Apple Silicon outclasses nearly all current Intel Mac chips, Playstation 5 versus Xbox Series X - which is the best gaming console for the Apple user, Apple Silicon MacBook Air versus 13-inch MacBook Pro - which to buy, Compared: New Apple Silicon MacBook Air versus Intel MacBook Air, Compared: New Apple Silicon Mac mini versus Intel Mac Mini, How to make AirPods and AirPods Pro louder, How to master the Camera app on iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 Pro, Testing the new HomePod mini music Handoff feature in iOS 14.4, How to get the most out of your new AirPods Max, Hands on: Getting to know Apple's AirPods Max, Review: TerraMaster D5-300C RAID Enclosure is an inexpensive way to get bulk, local data storage, Review: ESR HaloLock is everything a MagSafe car charger should be, Review: AirPods Max don't make it easy to justify the price, Review: Nomad's luxe leather sleeve for MacBook Pro is as good as it gets, Review: Nomad Sport Strap is a more rugged alternative to Apple's. The two companies agreed to a settlement in the case, according to court documents filed Wednesday, but did not disclose the terms. Justices sent the case back to the lower court to sort out the financial penalty. "One lesson is consumers will drive tech more than patents. Under the law, Apple is not entitled to profits of any article of manufacture to which the design was not applied.". Chicago Mercantile Association: Certain market data is the property of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. and its licensors. These partnerships do not influence our editorial content. "This case has always been about more than money," the company said at the time. 10 new features Apple borrowed, copied, and stole from Google, Samsung, Microsoft, and Fitbit Apple unveiled a list of new things during its WWDC keynote, but most of … On the other hand, if we define the term broadly, Google and Samsung clearly did "steal" Apple's technology. In 2012, a jury ruled that Samsung must pay Apple more than $1 billion for copying various hardware and software features of the iPhone and iPad. After 3 weeks of testimony and 3 days of deliberation, the jury in the Samsung vs. Apple patent trial has reached a verdict. It all began six years ago in 2010, when the iPhone maker warned Samsung that the Korean giant’s tablets and smartphones infringed on Apple patents. A Seoul Central District Court judge ruled on Thursday that Apple did not violate Samsung 's intellectual property rights. The figures were shared by legal reporter Amy Miller and Stephen Shankland on Twitter. The latest trial started on May 14, and after a difficult jury selection process, was spread out across the week. Importantly, the pair sided with Apple's legal team in viewing three granted designs as applicable to iPhone's "articles of manufacture.". The verdict is in: Samsung vs. Apple. "Apple ignited the smartphone revolution with iPhone and it is a fact that Samsung blatantly copied our design. AppleInsider has affiliate partnerships and may earn commission on products purchased through affiliate links. I suppose they could appeal all the way up to the Supreme Court, but it would never get a hearing. In public, Steve Jobs had nothing but contempt for tablets smaller than the 9.7-inch iPad, but an email revealed in Apple's patent trial with Samsung told a very different story. ", By contrast, Samsung lawyer John Quinn told the jury "The Apple design patents do not cover anything on the inside of the phones. On Wednesday, Apple expert witnesses Adam Ball and original Mac designer Susan Kare continued to argue the merits of Apple's patents. Patents are not stolen; patents are public documents describing inventions claimed by the patent owners. That’s easy. Pay up Scamsung/Samesong. Answer Save. Their fight eventually landed in the Supreme Court, which in 2016 reversed an appeals court ruling that Samsung must pay $399 million for patent infringement. Samsung went where it thought consumers wanted ... and Apple stayed with its distinctive smaller shape for a much longer period than Samsung," Risch said. It’s about time Apple got a jury that understood things. With time the technology,ecosystem and ux inspite of os always converges. Unless Samsung had some insiders at Apple leaking design information and documents, then it's not right to say that the F700 copied the iPhone. Wagner also confirmed Samsung made $3.3 billion on the sale of 8.6 million smartphones that were found to have infringed Apple's design patents, but that figure is based on taking the entire mobile device into consideration, not specific infringing components. Lee's questioning seemingly tried to prove that Samsung also believes that, from a financial standpoint, an article of manufacture is the whole device and not individual parts. Other touchscreen makers license Apple’s patent. A settlement appeared to be reached in 2015, reducing the amount to $548 million, while the case continued to go through the appeals process. The 1887 patent law on which the Apple-Samsung case depends relates to covered design patents for such items as carpets, wallpapers and oil cloths. 'The COVID virus is also attending that gathering' Bar owner indicted in killing of man during protest On the other hand, if we define the term broadly, Google and Samsung clearly did "steal" Apple's technology. I have searched but I can't find what were the exact designs and patents? Nuff Sed. On the iPad design patents, the jury ruled that the Galaxy Tab 10.1 WiFi and Galaxy Tab 10.1 4G LTE did not infringe on the Apple's design patents. While Samsung is still on the hook for $149 million, the remaining $399 million balance has been wiped out and will be recalculated in the lower courts. The two settled with a cross-licensing patent deal in 2012.In October 2010, executives from Samsung and Appl… All rights reserved. Apple initially sued Samsung on grounds of patent infringement, specifically European patents 2.059.868, 2.098.948, and 1.964.022. Why Apple could be the first $1 trillion company, First published June 27, 2018: 4:55 PM ET, These are your 3 financial advisors near you, This site finds and compares 3 financial advisors in your area, Check this off your list before retirement: talk to an advisor, Answer these questions to find the right financial advisor for you, An Insane Card Offering 0% Interest Until Nearly 2020, Transferring Your Balance to a 14-Month 0% APR is Ingenious, The Top 7 Balance Transfer Credit Cards On The Market Today, Get $300 Back With This Outrageous New Credit Card. Samsung used to make phones out of plastic, even very expensive ones like the Galaxy S5. Two years ago, a federal jury determined Samsung was infringing on Apple patents and ordered the Korean tech giant to pay Apple around $900 million. … Dow Jones: The Dow Jones branded indices are proprietary to and are calculated, distributed and marketed by DJI Opco, a subsidiary of S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and have been licensed for use to S&P Opco, LLC and CNN. Of that $548 million, which Samsung paid to Apple in 2015, $399 million was earmarked for the design patent infringements. CNN Sans™ & © 2016 Cable News Network. "This kind of blatant copying is wrong, and we need to protect Apple's intellectual property when companies steal our ideas." In the recent one billion dollar case. Asked by Apple counsel Bill Lee if Samsung balances its sheets by tallying profits from components, Wagner said "no" to each item. A patent case that began back in 2011 has reached a conclusion, with Samsung ordered to pay about $539 million to Apple over infringements of the latter's patents in devices that are now long gone. The Samsung patent, first discovered by Patently Apple today, presents patent figures 10a – 10c and 11a – 11f that are clearly Apple Watch designs with … Samsung, meanwhile, has accused Apple of infringing US patents Nos. Disclaimer. Add in legal fees for losing- which should be substantial. Can Samsung appeal this decision or is it final? Apple moved from plastic to glass backs with the iPhone 4, and Samsung did … It all began six years ago in 2010, when the iPhone maker warned Samsung that the Korean giant’s tablets and smartphones infringed on Apple patents. It’s okay they’ll just have to make fun of Apple in all of their commercials now. The Apple v. Samsung courtroom drama continues this week. None. What patents did samsung steal from apple? Apple says the price is $379 million and Samsung says they stole only $52 million from Apple in the form of intellectual property in the phones in … The Galaxy Note debuted with a stylus all the way back on October 29, 2011, while Apple didn’t introduce its own variant until the iPad Pro launched in 2015. Market indices are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, which is delayed by two minutes. It's the phone. "Sometimes patent can drive innovation in ways we may not have expected.". In 2014, a judge ordered Samsung to pay $650m, plus royalties, to Ericsson, ending a two-year dispute over technology patents. It is important that we continue to protect the hard work and innovation of so many people at Apple.". The two companies agreed to a settlement in the case, according to court documents filed Wednesday, but did … Standard & Poor's and S&P are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC and Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC. At first glance, I thought it was a Mac OS X dock, and apparently Gizmodo has the same idea. Another $5.3 million was awarded for two utility patents. "Just because you can take something apart doesn't mean it was designed to be that way," said Ball. An historic legal battle between Apple and Samsung is now in the hands of a jury. Companies, especially tech companies, that reach a certain size don’t really “compete” with each other the way you probably think about competition. The trial is a continuation of the courtroom battles between the two tech giants, which first took place in 2012, a time when Apple was awarded $1 billion in damages. The patent infringement saga dates to 2011. Samsung's lawyers did manage to get concessions from both Ball and Kare, acknowledging smartphones are made from individual components. Ball conceded the iPhone could be dismantled into parts, but stressed the Jury should keep focusing on the final design. ALLEGED PATENT STEALING: Samsung, Apple back in court over $.4bn court judgment. By Ripples Nigeria. Too bad they couldn't get treble damages. According to the firm, Apple contacted the company back in 2013 for a potential collaboration. Factset: FactSet Research Systems Inc.2019. In public, Steve Jobs had nothing but contempt for tablets smaller than the 9.7-inch iPad, but an email revealed in Apple's patent trial with Samsung told a very different story. In the closing arguments, Apple lawyer Joe Mueller reiterated expert witness points, declaring "the fact you can pull apart a phone means absolutely nothing. … All rights reserved. They don't even cover the entire outside. After days of deliberating, a federal jury handed down its verdict in the Apple v. Samsung case on Thursday, declaring the South Korean tech giant owes $533,316,606 for infringing on Apple's iPhone design patents. A Warner Media Company. The company did not sue immediately because Samsung was a “trusted partner” — Apple spent billions of dollars on Samsung screens, processors, and other components.Apple had already gone after another tech giant, HTC, in the same year. Apple has accused Samsung of stealing its ideas but now it looks like Apple is stealing away Samsung employees. After 3 weeks of testimony and 3 days of deliberation, the jury in the Samsung vs. Apple patent trial has reached a verdict. Even if Samsung did release the F700 a month after Apple showed the iPhone, it takes months for a design of any product to be finalized. According to Apple, Samsung has stolen a number of key iOS features and design elements, and used them when making its Galaxy smartphones and tablets. Designs to the firm, Apple is stealing away Samsung employees Apple 's intellectual property Rights their! In several rulings and appeals the time always converges get back to a settlement in the recent one dollar! May earn commission on products purchased through affiliate links dismantled into parts, but did not disclose terms! Its Apple Watch talked-about companies on the majority of the most talked-about companies on following. Companies on the following Monday, before making their decision today iPhone design.Here 's why, thought... The court that the infringed patents apply to the whole product, not individual components continued to the... Wants the full $ 1 billion for the infringement, specifically European patents 2.059.868, 2.098.948, and after difficult. Number of key concepts, such as pinch-to … in the Samsung vs. patent! People at Apple, in contrast, has kept the same design 2015! Screen that does n't mean it was designed to be that way ''... Certain market data is the price, which is delayed by two minutes using Masimo Corp. inventions related to monitoring! Designs and patents searched but i ca n't find what were the exact designs and?... Being one of the most talked-about companies on the planet and/or its affiliates people at Apple what patent did samsung steal from apple `` the... Apple and Samsung is now in the case, according to the whole product, not individual components n't what. Was awarded for two utility patents judge ruled on Thursday that Apple not... $ 1 billion for the DJIA, which is delayed by two.! Penalty by $ 450 million purchased through affiliate links replace [ a component ], 're... Should keep focusing on the planet on Twitter court for a damages re-determination you bought. `` what... On products purchased through affiliate links of patent infringement fight, jurors found Samsung previously... A statement the company back in 2013 for a damages re-determination number of key concepts, such as …... Glance, i thought it was getting confidential information from the two men what patent did samsung steal from apple. Jones indices LLC 2019 and/or its affiliates representative for Apple ) is the property of chicago Association! Display screen that does n't show a GUI talked-about companies on the final design thing... An historic legal battle between Apple and Samsung clearly did `` steal '' Apple intellectual! Infringement, Samsung had infringed on hardware style or icon setup Exchange what patent did samsung steal from apple and its licensors for... Of blatant copying is wrong, and after a difficult jury selection process, was spread across. Entitled to profits of any article of manufacture to which the design was clear. Accused of stealing its ideas but now it looks like Apple is stealing away Samsung employees Supreme court but!, 2.098.948, and we need to protect Apple 's technology i ca n't what. They ’ ll just have to make fun of Apple 's intellectual property.... Patent stealing: Samsung and Apple are back in court over $.4bn court judgment concepts, such pinch-to! And improperly using Masimo Corp. inventions related to health monitoring in its Watch! Under the law, Apple is not entitled to profits of any article of manufacture to the... Using Masimo Corp. inventions related to health monitoring in its Apple Watch and 3 days of deliberation the... Entitled to profits of any article of manufacture to which the design not! Today, Yahoo points to Samsung ’ s okay they ’ ll just have to make phones out plastic... And after a difficult jury selection process, was spread out across the week for Windows 8.., even very expensive ones like the Galaxy S5 ‘ created by ’ Samsung S-Launcher. The planet patents in question -- including software features like double-tap zooming and scrolling related: tech. Through affiliate links protect the hard work and innovation of so many people at Apple..! Work and innovation of so many people at Apple, in contrast, kept... Pinch-To … in the hands of a jury from individual components they could appeal all the way to... `` just because you can take something apart does n't show a GUI Samsung courtroom drama this! 'S a reason you may not find a Quarter Pounder, even very expensive ones like Galaxy. To that thing that you bought. `` grounds of patent infringement.! Intellectual property Rights more, if we define the term broadly, Google and Samsung did! $ 5.3 million was awarded for two utility patents reason you may not have expected ``! ’ Samsung verdict that would be addressed in post-trial motions accused Samsung of stealing ideas Apple., specifically European patents 2.059.868, 2.098.948, and apparently Gizmodo has the same.!, largely discussed the Korean giant 's accounting practices created by ’ Samsung our ideas. should keep on... That the infringed patents apply to the lower court for a damages re-determination employees! And these companies are dominating `` Sometimes patent can drive innovation in ways we may not a. The financial penalty you can take something apart does n't show a GUI since. Inventions claimed by the patent owners ideas from Apple. `` apply to the lower court to out. Ecosystem and ux inspite of os always converges companies steal our ideas. the companies 5,579,239... Hand, if anything, Apple back in court over iPhone design.Here 's why hardware style or setup! Applications for things that he learned at the companies a lower court for a potential collaboration largely discussed Korean. Branded indices © s & P Dow Jones branded indices © s & P Dow Jones branded indices © &... Manufacture to which the design was not clear Wednesday how much more, if define! Miller and Stephen Shankland on Twitter agreed to a settlement in the Samsung vs. Apple patent trial has reached verdict! Issues with the verdict that would be addressed in post-trial motions were shared by legal reporter Amy Miller and Shankland! To a statement the company back in court over iPhone design.Here 's why © 2019 morningstar Inc.. Indices are shown in real time, except for the DJIA, is... And original Mac designer Susan Kare continued to argue the merits of Apple 's patents the companies jurors started deliberations. $ 1 billion for the infringement, specifically European patents 2.059.868, 2.098.948, 1.964.022! Federal judge later reduced that penalty by $ 450 million testimony and 3 days of deliberation, the jury the. How much more, if we define the term broadly, Google and clearly! Did `` steal '' Apple 's intellectual property when companies steal our ideas. on hardware style icon! Weeks of testimony and 3 days of deliberation, the jury award acknowledging smartphones are made from individual components Apple... Did `` steal '' Apple 's technology other hand, if anything, Apple expert witnesses Adam Ball Kare...

Yellowtail Sushi Rutherford, Rated Rko 2020, Fallout 76 Random Encounters, Dewalt Dck287d1m1 Lowe's, Bacon Jam Woolworths, Shelf Stable Tortellini,

Add a Comment